Conservative Liberal

FDR would have been a Republican today.

The importance of the Home Front

I posted several times about my Protest Warrior activities in San DiegoThis particular article is an great reminder of why I consider it my duty to participate in the San Diego Chapter of Protest Warrior and why the only excuse for not being involved at all should be an actual combat deployment (yes, I really think that).

Carl von Clausewitz is the father of modern strategic thought. His experience was in the Napoleonic Wars, at the dawn of the industrial revolution, but he did not discuss technology. He assumed that armies would acquire whatever weapons were available in pursuit of the traditional objective of war, "to compel our enemy to do our will." When determining the power of an adversary, he notes two "inseparable factors, viz, the total means at his disposal and the strength of his will." With 300 million people and a $14 trillion economy, U.S. means are unrivaled by any combination of enemies in the Middle East. The weakness is in America’s will to mobilize adequate resources to sustain the kind of campaign needed to grind down a fanatical opponent. This is the weakness that the enemy has targeted with success. The high civilization of post-modern America seems unable to stand up to the ruthless exponents of Dark Age doctrines.

The eminent British military historian Jeremy Black reconfirms Clausewitz in his study War in the 21st Century, arguing that war "involves a constant– the willingness of organized groups to kill and, in particular, risk death." Material factors are "less important than its social, cultural and political context." In other words, the home front is the decisive theater of war (emphasis mine – Eric-Odessit). American forces that are superior in the overseas theaters of combat may be defeated, not by any failure of those who are there  risking death, but by the betrayal of those who are consumed by domestic luxuries and cannot bring themselves to think about the brutal realities of a dangerous world.


Today, the U.S. Congress is a quarrelsome place. Proposals to micro-manage the Iraq War show no consistent thought or grasp of strategy. Fight al-Qaeda, but no other foes. Support the troops, but don’t let them win before they are pulled out at some arbitrary date. The only unifying themes are partisanship and political ambition. This is the behavior that doomed democratic Athens, and which will render all the marvelous new military technology useless.

Please read it all.  And please participate in our counter-protests in the future.

Powered by Qumana

March 27, 2007 - Posted by | Uncategorized


  1. Wow….we’re still bogged down in a pointless war with no real strategy for being able to leave, terrorists now have even more ways of recruiting new members, and at the same time, 90% of fake bombs made it through security at Denver Intl. airport and cargo containers still aren’t getting full inspection. So much for real security.

    Comment by TikiLoungeLizard | March 31, 2007 | Reply

  2. Ah yes, the home front. Brings to mind a quote from Nazi general Hermann Goring:

    “Naturally the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. …Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

    Comment by TikiLoungeLizard | March 31, 2007 | Reply

  3. The people of Kuwait, the Iraqi Kurds and Shiites didnt want war either.

    Its funny that you quote an enemy that the U.S. brought to justice for his crimes, much like we brought Saddam Hussein to justice.

    Ever heard the slogan No Justice, No Peace? Its popular at many protests. That is not a pacifist statement.

    The “Anti-war” movement is rife with those that “support the resistance”.

    And why is it that true pacifists always support the aims of the insurgents?

    If the insurgents stopped fighting the war would be over. If the U.S. stopped fighting the war would continue. Pacifists are on the wrong side.

    Comment by Freedom Now | April 10, 2007 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: